tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post3961208649324971990..comments2023-06-06T06:33:55.098-05:00Comments on Whallah!: Time For Some More SatireOther Sidehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06475658453374184885noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post-83883897815554800462007-11-13T13:07:00.000-06:002007-11-13T13:07:00.000-06:00Yes, the lathering continues. Anyone who criticiz...Yes, <A HREF="http://texasholdemblogger.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/memo-to-the-idiots-on-the-hate-left/" REL="nofollow">the lathering continues</A>. Anyone who criticizes P-Dig is now The Hate Left. Anyone who visits the same web sites as Peter and comments in the same threads is a stalker. And if you don't agree with him, you should kill yourself. "By the way, I don’t retract or apologize for one word I’ve ever written here. Ever. If you don’t like that, the hell with you." Wow, does this apply to critics like Jessica and Paddy?<BR/><BR/>Let's pick a post at random, the top post right now. Inside of 160 words, he calls Hillary "The Hildabeast," the "Pantsuit Queen," "Shrillary," mentions "Clintonistas", calls her "Hitlary", then confuses Hugo Perez and Hugo Chavez. Or maybe he thinks the next president has to deal with Sheboygan's mayor along with Osama. I could care less what he thinks of the Clintons. I don't have much affection for them myself. I think he's baiting, it's so over the top.<BR/><BR/>Jessica says anyone who criticizes Jessica is a stalker. Jessica blames the left for all this because they "cry wolf" so much, cheapening useful terms like racism and gender discrimination, and because they don't research items as well as they should. <BR/><BR/>On the other hand, she's content to make posts that start with vague phrases like "Some liberal is apparently demanding that Patrick McIlheran remove Texas Hold Em blog from his blogroll", only linking to Peter's post which also does not grant any favor by linking to the actual post claimed. She doesn't find it necessary to read the comments on the blogs she reads, and thinks that it's not so bad if a blogger said something in a comment as opposed to a post. So Peter is to be excused because he was having a tough time long ago and he only said the naughty bits in a comment. As opposed to Nov. 12, where he comments on his own blog, "Seriously, they can play hide and go f*ck themselves. Anyone who accommodates them needs to grow a pair." (My editing.)Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post-75487524290341578672007-11-13T06:28:00.000-06:002007-11-13T06:28:00.000-06:00Peter has this to say today:Memo to the Idiots on ...Peter has this to say today:<BR/><BR/><I>Memo to the Idiots on the Hate Left<BR/><BR/>And that’s every last one of you. Don’t you ever darken the door of this place again. In fact, go to hell. Go straight to hell.<BR/><BR/>Here’s all I have to say to you.<BR/><BR/>If I had to say one more thing, it would end with the words “…and the horse you rode in on.”<BR/><BR/>You succeeded in making me even more defiant of you. I’d suggest the whole lot of you do the world a favor by taking a header off a bridge but I don’t think we could get that lucky.<BR/><BR/>By the way, this is my place. And I always get the last word here.</I><BR/><BR/>Some, long, tedious, incredibly boorish rough time he's going through. When will it ever end?Other Sidehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06475658453374184885noreply@blogger.com