tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post3965947128882291923..comments2023-06-06T06:33:55.098-05:00Comments on Whallah!: She's Not A Constitutional Scholar EitherOther Sidehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06475658453374184885noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post-39402366845032974162009-10-08T15:02:08.292-05:002009-10-08T15:02:08.292-05:00"She obviously knows we don't vote for Fe..."She obviously knows we don't vote for Federal judges."<br /><br />Then what the hell is her point.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post-58978777147678451122009-10-07T23:02:13.465-05:002009-10-07T23:02:13.465-05:00This coming from you Roland. How droll!This coming from you Roland. <a href="http://cognidissidence.blogspot.com/2009/10/this-is-how-they-define-classy.html" rel="nofollow">How droll!</a>capperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08751967312821403092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post-40995896351861275142009-10-07T11:28:40.498-05:002009-10-07T11:28:40.498-05:00Did you read her article? She clearly refers to Ob...Did you read her article? She clearly refers to Obama appointing Butler, therefore she obviously knows we don't vote for Federal judges.<br /><br />What's preventing you from arguing against her position (Obama's appointment of Butler subverts the will of the people) on it's merits, or lack of them? Laziness? Stupidity? Basic dishonesty?Roland Melnickhttp://badgerblogger.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post-29550983333579607992009-10-03T21:16:55.099-05:002009-10-03T21:16:55.099-05:00Butler ran successfully for election to a Wisconsi...Butler ran successfully for election to a Wisconsin trial court in 2002, says the author. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin is also a trial court. Therefore, according to the author's own reasoning, she should be supporting his nomination.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com