tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post684454597216725746..comments2023-06-06T06:33:55.098-05:00Comments on Whallah!: He Was For It Before He Was Against ItOther Sidehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06475658453374184885noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post-56771513780348855752007-11-24T09:08:00.000-06:002007-11-24T09:08:00.000-06:00Perhaps it would be more expensive, but it would n...Perhaps it would be more expensive, but it would not force taxpayers to specifically subsidize cohabitants engaged in illicit sex.<BR/><BR/>As to "interfering with other bennies," you'll have to explain that.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post-67187638145208070032007-11-21T20:38:00.000-06:002007-11-21T20:38:00.000-06:00You're right Dad, it's not the same. PaddyMac's s...You're right Dad, it's not the same. PaddyMac's suggestion would be more expensive, and would increase governmental involvement as it would start interfering with other benefits. <BR/><BR/>Much simpler and cheaper to have done the right thing in the first place. But that wouldn't fit into the right's dogma, would it?capperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08751967312821403092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3561726959150987222.post-50188087265998155602007-11-21T16:56:00.000-06:002007-11-21T16:56:00.000-06:00You must be an MPS graduate.There's a clear differ...You must be an MPS graduate.<BR/><BR/>There's a clear difference between what P-Mac allowed for (a "+1" policy) and what Morales wants.<BR/><BR/>Unless, of course, you cannot read.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.com