If Gableman thinks that a sucessful defense of a client is somehow, "finding a loophole," he might be just too effing dumb to sit on the bench. Here's a candidate that would sic a rotweiller on Perry Mason.
Nevermind that he can't seem to tell the difference between a criminal serving out a sentence and being released. His basic disregard for reality should be enough to have him disqualified.
If he really, really, truly hates loopholes why hasn't he smacked down on Scooter Jensen? Oh, yeah. Nevermind again. Miserable, effing hack.
Former prosecutors with an IQ below their age should not be elceted to judicial offices.
ReplyDelete