Let's see how many of the right's "family values" men (or even women) challenge him on this post. Should we place bets?? I predict not one of the "followers" has the stones to question the pig's judgment??
Everyone talks about Charlie Sykes and his adultery. Why don't more people mention the fact that one of his wives went on assistance, making him a deadbeat. AND that he got caught making up quotes while working at the Journal, so he is also a fabulist, a documented liar, whose ass was saved by a freaking UNION. The irony is too rich.
"Why don't more people mention the fact that one of his wives went on assistance, making him a deadbeat."
How would the average person even know such information to talk about it?? Come on...unless you are a stalker and dig into people's personal lives or the ex has a blog and writes about it...how should we know this??
Do you think for a moment if Sykes could use embarassing personal facts for political advantage he'd hesitate? He IS A DEADBEAT, AN ADULTERER, A FABULIST, and yet the braindead conservatives, who would burn people liberals at the stake for his behavior, are living in denial. Sykes has stalked a fair number of his political opponents. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
I'm not saying anything of the sort. I'm just saying most average people don't have that sort of information about other people unless they know them personally.
I have no doubt Sykes would indeed use personal information against anyone he doesn't like or agree with...and I would even say he strikes me as the kind of guy that would even throw someone he likes under the bus if it meant he'd get something out of it. He's not alone though...there are many people out there that would act similarly.
Let's see how many of the right's "family values" men (or even women) challenge him on this post. Should we place bets?? I predict not one of the "followers" has the stones to question the pig's judgment??
ReplyDeleteSo...not a single person (conservative) had enough integrity to tell Sykes he is out-of-line. Why am I not surprised??
ReplyDeletedid he get in trouble with liz woodhouse? probably not - she shouldn't be surprised.
ReplyDeleteEveryone talks about Charlie Sykes and his adultery. Why don't more people mention the fact that one of his wives went on assistance, making him a deadbeat. AND that he got caught making up quotes while working at the Journal, so he is also a fabulist, a documented liar, whose ass was saved by a freaking UNION. The irony is too rich.
ReplyDelete"Why don't more people mention the fact that one of his wives went on assistance, making him a deadbeat."
ReplyDeleteHow would the average person even know such information to talk about it?? Come on...unless you are a stalker and dig into people's personal lives or the ex has a blog and writes about it...how should we know this??
Do you think for a moment if Sykes could use embarassing personal facts for political advantage he'd hesitate? He IS A DEADBEAT, AN ADULTERER, A FABULIST, and yet the braindead conservatives, who would burn people liberals at the stake for his behavior, are living in denial. Sykes has stalked a fair number of his political opponents. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 9:13PM:
ReplyDeleteI'm not saying anything of the sort. I'm just saying most average people don't have that sort of information about other people unless they know them personally.
I have no doubt Sykes would indeed use personal information against anyone he doesn't like or agree with...and I would even say he strikes me as the kind of guy that would even throw someone he likes under the bus if it meant he'd get something out of it. He's not alone though...there are many people out there that would act similarly.