Almost The Perfect Post

McBride is back, and at least for tonight, is actually posting more than one piece. Her first post of the night is about how some conservative talk radio hosts are spewing hateful, vitriolic poison at Huckabee. She encourages them to discuss the issues, and not get so personal.

Looking past the hypocritical nature of the post, considering she has spewed more than enough hate at people in her time (think Eugene Kane, for one), it is actually a good post.

There are some flaws though. The obvious one is the one I already mentioned. It would be better coming from someone who wasn't as hypocritical. The second problem is the second from last paragraph (emphasis hers):

Personally, I am more of a tax-and-terror conservative. I care about social issues like abortion (I am pro-life) but, perhaps because it's a time of war, I place them secondary in this presidential election. I wish there was a candidate who was strong on all the issues, but there's not (except maybe Mitt Romney, and I don't trust him). I've always leaned toward Rudy Giuliani.

She is way off by saying she would rather see babies die, so that more soldiers can die in an unjust war? That is not exactly good Christian values. And no, I won't do the obvious why she might like Rudy line. It's already been done with Sykes.

The third problem with this is in the comments thread. A reader comments about how Huckabee brought the attacks on himself, to which McBride replies:

Romney's gone on the attack too

Tough examination is one thing; vitriol and namecaling (sic) is another.

Again, with the hypocrisy. The worst part is I truly believe she believes it herself.