Fortunately, we have the original prototype of John, Mickey. The only guy besides John Foust that I know of that was kicked off of Boots and
Mike Plaisted’s post would be funny and poignant if Mike Plaisted wasn’t such a lib tool.
One of Demolibs’ biggest misconceptions is that the Mike Plaisted liberal ideologues of the world, see “Conservatives” vis a vis their own Lib template.
In other words, liberals are generally dishonest ass-hats, and in their twisted world of dishonesty, they EXPECT and BELIEVE, those whom they disagree with and abhor, are PHONIES like they are. It’s kind of like a UNION CONTRACT negotiation technique. Libs are lying windbags. Libs are anything BUT diverse. Libs are weak needy, government, group think dependant, coalition needy, panderers. And they cannot relate to those who ARE NOT. Lying and posturing is seen as acceptable as long as the PARTY achieves it’s goals.
Take Rodham for example. She’d lie to her own offspring for power. She played soccer in high school. NOT. She was named for Sir Edmund Hilary. NOT. Her daughter Chelsea was jogging past the WTC at 9/11. NOT.
Lying comes naturally to a liberal. The specifics don’t matter. The “PARTY” matters.Until NOW. The “PARTY” doesn’t matter to Rodham anymore. The common good” isn’t relevant. ANYMORE.
Sir Edmund Rodham is all that matters. Look at Billy.
He’s making an ass of himself.
But again, that matters NOT to the Plaisteds’ of the world.
Mickey, and his (her?) ability to get his (her?) meds is a good argument why we need health care reform.
ReplyDeleteI don't think you appreciate the lyrical beauty of Mickey. Her soft poetry will set the example for the RanDoM CAps scHoOl within a dozen years. She will be feted on the stages of New York alongside the great lyricists, Boy George and Burt Bacharach.
ReplyDeleteTo quote Mencken: http://www.bartleby.com/66/80/39080.html
"That is to say, he writes the worst English that I have ever encountered. It reminds me of a string of wet sponges; it reminds me of tattered washing on the line; it reminds me of stale bean soup, of college yells, of dogs barking idiotically through endless nights. It is so bad that a sort of grandeur creeps into it. It drags itself out of the dark abysm (I was about to write abscess!) of pish, and crawls insanely up the topmost pinnacle of posh. It is rumble and bumble. It is flap and doodle. It is balder and dash."
All hail, Mickey.
Frankly, I'm honored to have caught Mickey's attention, however disordered. I must be coming up in the world.
ReplyDeleteBurt wrote the tunes, Hal David wrote the lyrics (and, more recently, Elvis Costello).
ReplyDeleteWhat do you have to do to get kicked out of Boots and Sabers? (besides giving a Foustian tutorial on sock puppetry)
ReplyDeleteI think the real reason I was kicked off was that an early B&K post made fun of Wendy. First rule, never p-o the wife. I am sure Wendy was waiting for me to violate the TOS in some way, so in the thread about sock-puppetry when I pointed out she was being a bit naive, that no doubt was the last straw. It's been 113 days and counting. I'm still waiting for Owen's apology for unjustly accusing me of sock-puppeting a "half-dozen" times. He's ask the same if someone said it about him.
ReplyDeleteY'all might like Mickey, but I was entranced by the guy on RDW named PCD. He was a monomaniac about liberals.
So when's the next blogger party where Gableman is not invited?
I'm not sure if this is the same "John" but I remember being totally disgusted with this rant...
ReplyDeletehttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7114651656317558365&postID=8024547367714124378
Sometimes...you could almost see the humor in some of these comments if it weren't for the fact that people like him are dead serious and really hate a lot of people on that level.
FP-
ReplyDeleteThat is indeed the same John. There are a handful of posts on Whallah! highlighting his "better" comments.
3rd way-
ReplyDeleteMickey got the boot for being too abusive. Ironically he and PCD have found a home at Badger Blogger. Why Patrick puts up with them, I don't know.
Perhaps because Patrick isn't any better, IMO.
ReplyDeleteI'll give you that Patrick can get rather Dooleyesque at times, but I have had decent, rationale debates with him in the past.
ReplyDeleteOverall, he's not as bad as some of the more abrasive ones.